passive auth and login handlers

[Paul Hethmon]

SIDP-510

My thought is that this should be a WARN, much as a Authn request with an
invalid time would be. The error condition is expected and returning this
type of response is the proper response when passive cannot be honored.

thanks,

Paul


On 8/11/11 5:46 PM, "Chad La Joie" <lajoie at itumi.biz> wrote:

>You can file a bug for it.  What should or should not get logged at
>what level is unfortunately very context dependent.  If some one
>expected that request to succeed then it is an error if it doesn't.
>If they didn't then its not.
>
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 16:01, Paul Hethmon
><paul.hethmon at clareitysecurity.com> wrote:
>> One more follow up. This gets the SAML Response correct, however, Shib
>> still logs an ERROR from AuthenticationEngine. Doesn't seem like it
>>should.
>
>-- 
>Chad La Joie
>www.itumi.biz
>trusted identities, delivered
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net